ASBESTOS UPDATE: Lawsuits v. Sealed Air Still Ongoing in Canada

Sealed Air Corporation continues face asbestos-related lawsuits in Canadian courts.

In November 2004, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary Sealed Air (Canada) Co./Cie learned that it had been named a defendant in the case of Thundersky v. The Attorney General of Canada, et…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Still Faces Cases in Canadian Courts

Sealed Air Corporation continues face asbestos-related lawsuits in Canadian courts.

In November 2004, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary Sealed Air (Canada) Co./Cie learned that it had been named a defendant in the case of Thundersky v. The Attorney General of Canada, et…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Still Subject to Lawsuits in Canada

Sealed Air Corporation continues to be subject to asbestos-related actions filed in Canadian courts.

In November 2004, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary Sealed Air (Canada) Co./Cie learned that it had been named a defendant in the case of Thundersky v. The Attorney…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Subject to Cryovac Transaction Cases

Since the beginning of 2000, Sealed Air Corporation has been served with a number of lawsuits alleging that, as a result of the Cryovac transaction, the Company is responsible for alleged asbestos liabilities of W. R. Grace & Co. and…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Corp. Party to Cryovac Deal Actions

Sealed Air Corporation, since 2000, has been served with lawsuits alleging that, as a result of the Cryovac transaction, the Company is responsible for alleged asbestos liabilities of W. R. Grace & Co. and its subsidiaries, some of which were…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Unit Still Party to Thundersky Claim

Sealed Air Corporation’s Canadian subsidiary, Sealed Air (Canada) Co./Cie, since 2004, is a defendant in an asbestos case styled Thundersky v. The Attorney General of Canada, et al. (File No. CI04-01-39818).

The case is pending in the Manitoba Court of Queen’s…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Fresenius Still Involved in Sealed Air Actions

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA continues to be engaged in litigation with Sealed Air Corporation to confirm its entitlement to indemnification from Sealed Air for all losses and expenses incurred by the Company relating to pre-Merger tax liabilities…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Corp. Still Involved in MPERS Action

Sealed Air Corporation continues to be party to an asbestos- related class action lawsuit involving the Louisiana Municipal Police Employees Retirement System (MPERS).

On Sept. 15, 2003, the case of Senn v. Hickey, et al. (Case No. 03-CV-4372) was filed in…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Cites $300T for Settlement Agreement

Sealed Air Corporation says that settlement agreement and related costs reflected legal and related fees for asbestos-related matters of US$300,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and US$800,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.

On Nov. 27,…

ASBESTOS UPDATE: Sealed Air Units Still Facing Claims in Canada

Certain of Sealed Air Corporation’s subsidiaries in Canada are still parties to asbestos-related litigation filed in various Canadian courts.

In November 2004, the Company’s Canadian subsidiary Sealed Air (Canada) Co./Cie learned that it had been named a defendant in the case…

Page 1 of 212»